Utilities Section


Inspiring Excellence in Education and Life

Utility Tools Section

Deputy Head of School Blog

A Fresh Perspective on Education

Prospective parents often inquire about the status of Mulgrave as a leading school when considering it for their children. There are many indicators we point to – strong IB results, top university placements, scholarships awards, excellent faculty, a rounded holistic education, outstanding facilities and rigorous accreditations from global bodies, such as the IB and the Council of International Schools (CIS). Another important indicator, however, is the recognition that Mulgrave receives from other educational organizations.

Mulgrave is increasingly recognised as a world leader in education and innovative practice. Recently, Mulgrave was one of four CIS member schools selected to attend an important meeting convened by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in Boston, USA this December. The CIS featured Mulgrave, along with Frankfurt International School (Germany), International School of Lausanne (Switzerland), and Seoul Foreign School (South Korea), in its global newsletter congratulating us on this prestigious opportunity.

The OECD meeting will bring together top international schools from across the globe. It will focus on the theme: "Rethinking Education for the 21st Century: Global Learning Network Convening of World-Leading Schools". As the OECD writes:

The Global Learning Network's international convening will explore the rapid shifts happening in the 21st century economy and society, and the necessary vision of aligning learning to labor market and economic needs. Throughout the convening, participants will be asked to closely examine their own thinking on how to prepare students for the 21st century economy and empower them to be active citizens, providing participants with the unique opportunity to share insights, resources, and best practices to stay ahead of the curve and further accelerate their progress. This convening will bring together educators from 30 schools from the United States, Canada, Germany, Singapore, Switzerland, and South Korea, all carefully selected with proven records of excellence, innovation, and commitment to continuous improvement.

The OECD convening of world-leading schools promises to be a rich opportunity to network with other top schools and keep abreast of leading edge change in education to ensure that a Mulgrave education continues to offer the best preparation for career and citizenship in the mid-21st century. Mr. Jones and I will be attending the meeting on behalf of Mulgrave. We look forward to sharing some of the learning and insights from the conference with the Mulgrave community when we return.

The honour of being selected for the OECD meeting follows on the heels of Mulgrave's inclusion in the HundredEd Conference recently held in Finland. As featured in Connexions, the HundredEd Conference showcased its ranking of the top 100 innovations in education from around the world. Mulgrave's development of live-time assessment and feedback practices garnered much attention from international and Canadian independent schools alike.

The world is rapidly changing and education must continue to evolve to keep pace. We believe strongly that an IB Continuum education, with its broad holistic approach, offers the best preparation for a life well-lived in the mid-21st century. At the same time, we will continue to innovate and enhance the educational programme at Mulgrave so that our students have the key skills, knowledge, and personal competencies to achieve their personal best in education and life. Our participation in the OECD's meeting is one more sign that we are delivering on that agenda.

Read more about Mulgrave Selected to join OECD Global Learning Network

The string of stale smelling portables unfurled in a lazy line trailing away from the north side of Quilchena Elementary School in West Richmond. The third of these tin-roofed, formaldehyde cubes was my Grade 5 classroom.

I still recall one particular lesson on a clear-skied afternoon when Ms. Kaser, our teacher at the time and now the co-leader of the Centre for Innovative Educational Leadership at Vancouver Island University, engaged us in a debate. Citing the brain science of the day — prehistoric in comparison to today's world of fMRIs — Ms. Kaser intentionally set up a false dichotomy to prompt our participation. If we could use only one side of our brains, would it be the left (responsible for logic, science, and math) or the right (where emotion, the arts, and physical activity were activated)?

The debate came to a facetious conclusion when no one wished to utilise only the left side of their brain, for fear of becoming a 500-pound couch potato solving math problems. We were 10 and summer was fast approaching. The false dichotomy of left brain versus right brain reminds me a great deal of another false contrast being framed in education today — STEM versus liberal arts.

STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programmes are currently receiving attention in the media. This is not surprising given the historical track record of American education. In response to the Soviets launching Sputnik in 1957, critics reacted by calling for increased STEM to close the obvious technology gap between the superpowers.

The technology gap reared its head again in 1982 when Ronald Reagan famously commissioned an education paper entitled, A Nation at Risk, a paper warning of the imminent danger to American hegemony if the US failed to increase science and technology outcomes in schools. It turns out that STEM is not a new concept; it has been around for 60 years by one name or another.

Proponents of STEM programmes today advocate for increasing these subjects in the curriculum, couching their rhetoric in terms of raising job prospects and increasing economic outputs. Their calculus in divvying up the curriculum for increased time on STEM subjects, however, would entail a decrease in time for arts and humanities. This framing of STEM initiatives by the media and STEM advocates, or by what author Hugh MacLennan might have termed, "the high priests of the Dialectic," is a false dichotomy. It's Ms. Kaser asking us to choose left brain versus right brain.

The reality in schools is that a liberal arts education and STEM are not mutually exclusive. One does not preclude the other. Schools don't have to rob Peter to pay Paul. Schools with liberal arts programmes often have strong STEM components because they are, by definition and constitution, broad and well-rounded. This includes a focus on science, math, and technology. The IB programme is a prime example of this with its holistic approach.

Liberal art programmes remain the most viable and critical preparation for the workplace and citizenship. As contributing author Willard Dix wrote in Forbes magazine, "A liberal arts degree is more important than ever." The president of Oregon State University, Edward Ray, recently echoed this when he cited a survey of national employers in the United States:

  • More than 9 in 10 want those they hire to demonstrate ethical judgment and integrity, intercultural skills, and the capacity for continued new learning.
  • More than three-fourths of employers want more emphasis on: critical thinking, complex problem-solving, written and oral communication, and applied knowledge in real-world settings.
  • Nearly three-fourths would recommend this kind of education to a young person they know as the best way to prepare for success in today's global economy. (www.aacu.org)

Ray went on to write that "...in today's world of changing demographics, 24/7 news cycles, and a global marketplace, the liberal arts are critical to success in every economic sector. There can be no doubt that they play an essential part in providing a foundation for learning in every professional field."

It is true that STEM programmes, just like liberal arts programmes, foster the development of critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration. These are indeed worthy outcomes. It is more questionable, however, whether they provide much in the way of intercultural skills, general ethics, and citizenship, equally important outcomes in an increasingly globalized world.

As Ray astutely points out, "Our society desperately needs the grounding in ethical thinking and questioning that the liberal arts provide. Improving engineering fundamentals will accomplish little if our ethical foundations keep eroding." It's a cliché, but schools that become too parochial in promulgating STEM at the expense of the arts and humanities risk throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

A more critical view of narrow-based STEM programmes reveals other potential issues. It is interesting to note, for example, that most universities still do not recognise computer science courses for credit in math and science faculties. Additionally, STEM programmes have the potential to exacerbate demographic inequalities, as women, indigenous peoples, and other groups tend to be significantly underrepresented. A parochial education would tend to lead to parochial outcomes.

Where does the balance lie then between liberal arts and STEM programmes? If both have merit and relevancy in a high quality education, what are leading educational organizations doing to marry the two?

A few months ago, I went to listen to the new president of UBC, Dr. Santa Ono, speak about the university's strategic direction in preparing students for a rapidly changing world and job market. He was adamant — UBC is about STEAM (emphasizing the value of the Arts) and not STEM. He spoke of the importance of foundational knowledge across all disciplines and the benefits of a holistic approach to learning. He also reiterated the gift of diversity in developing students for a post-multicultural world.

Mulgrave subscribes to this same notion of a STEAM-based education for students. Through the framework of the IB, we are STEAMing ahead with developing our curriculum. Over the last couple of years, we have introduced Music, Philosophy and Economics Higher Level (HL) courses in the Senior School, and at the same time have also introduced a new Design course with a strong emphasis on robotics. Additionally, in the Middle School, a raft of elective courses, including drone flying, dance, 3D modelling, and outdoor education supplement the strong academic core of science and math courses, creating an array of options to enrich and personalise the learning of students. And in the Junior School, Minecraft, Lego robotics and coding dot the landscape of co-curricular offerings, along with sports academies, ballet, and visual arts. STEAM is evident throughout the IB Continuum at Mulgrave, embedded as a core feature of a holistic, well-rounded education.

The best schools continue to evolve their programme offerings over time. In this day and age, it ought to include preparation for a digital world, but of higher importance, it continues to include what the liberal arts have always offered the best fundamental preparation for — democracy, intercultural skills, ethics, and global citizenship. This has never been truer than it is today, never more important, never more relevant. We look forward to ensuring that a Mulgrave education continues to be rich, holistic, and leading edge, inspiring excellence in education and life.

Read more about STEAMing Ahead

In the late 1940s, the US Air Force experienced an epidemic of crashes involving several different types of aircraft. Many of the accidents were attributed to pilot error and, in the course of investigating the causes, Air Force officials re-examined the design of the cockpit itself, which had been based on the average physical dimensions of pilots from 1926. In 1950, the Air Force hired researcher Gilbert Daniels from Harvard to ascertain the degree of fit between pilots and the cockpit dimensions, which he defined as a pilot whose measurements across 10 physical characteristics were within the middle 30 percent of the range.

Gilbert's findings were astonishing – of the 4,063 pilots studied not a single one fell within the average range across all ten dimensions (Rose, 2016, p. 4). This was despite the Air Force already filtering pilot selection according to its own concept of the average, eliminating pilots from consideration who were either too tall or too short. The moral of the story, according to author Todd Rose (2016), is: Any system designed around the average person is doomed to fail (p. 8). This is the counterintuitive conclusion of his book, The End of Average – How We Succeed in a World That Values Sameness.

The idea of the average has been a fundamental organising principle of the systems that underpinned 20th-century society, from how factories were organised, to how civic policies and social rank operated, to how school systems and curricula were designed. The notion of average was critical to the quest for standardisation. In this context, the understanding of the individual lay not in the recognition of their unique talents and strengths; rather, it was arrived at by comparing them to the average and determining how far below or above the standard they measured (Rose, 2016, p. 37). It is an idea that holds little credibility any longer in the social sciences.

Read more about The Meaning of Personalisation
Pluralism, Canada and Mulgrave

Canada, as a country, turns 149 years old tomorrow, inching ever closer to its auspicious sesquicentennial anniversary in 2017. I have lived in Canada all of my life and yet I am only now beginning to understand its complexity and the subtlety of its formation. It isn't perfect and those who are wont to throw stones at glass houses will find fault easily enough. It remains nevertheless a shining light in a world increasingly darkened with intolerance, distrust and xenophobia.

Read more about Pluralism, Canada and Mulgrave
The Continuum Teacher - How Teaching IB Engenders a Different Mindset

In his most recent blog post, Mr. MacIntyre illustrates how teaching in an IB continuum school, such as Mulgrave, is different than teaching in other types of schools - how it engenders a different mindset. He cites that through interdependence among colleagues, programmes and grades, Mulgrave teachers lift the learning of students and effectively abate the prevailing 'secondary achievement dip' that plagues many education systems around the world.

Read more about The Continuum Teacher - How Teaching IB Engenders a Different Mindset
Yale or Jail - Rethinking the University Admissions Game

On Tuesday of next week, Mulgrave is offering an Open Door session, 'You May be Wrong About University Admission – An Important Talk'. The focus will be on the latest thinking re-evaluating traditional views on what are the 'best' universities. The session will also highlight the concept of 'best-fit', the alignment of a student's interests, passions, and learning style and their university programme of choice. Malcom Gladwell details the long-term personal and economic benefits of 'best-fit' university choice in his latest book, David and Goliath, offering compelling counter examples to the idea that enrolling in an elite university is always the most productive pathway.

Read more about Yale or Jail - Rethinking the University Admissions Game
Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Aenean lacinia bibendum nulla sed consectetur. Cras mattis consectetur purus sit amet fermentum. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Morbi leo risus, porta ac consectetur ac, vestibulum at eros.